4.7 Article

Temporal and spatial variations in sand and dust storm events in East Asia from 2007 to 2016: Relationships with surface conditions and climate change

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 633, 期 -, 页码 452-462

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.068

关键词

Sand and dust storms; Surface conditions; NDVI; Climate change

资金

  1. National Key R AMP
  2. D Program Pilot Projects of China [2016YFA0601901, 2016YFC0203301]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41590874, 41375153]
  4. CAMS Basis Research Project [2017Z11, 2016Z001, 2014R17]
  5. Climate Change Special Fund of CMA [CCSF201504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed the frequency and intensity of sand and dust storms (SDSs) in East Asia from 2007 to 2016 using observational data from ground stations, numerical modeling, and vegetation indices obtained from both satellite and reanalysis data. The relationships of SDSs with surface conditions and the synoptic circulation pattern were also analyzed. The statistical analyses demonstrated that the number and intensity of SDS events recorded in spring during 2007 to 2016 showed a decreasing trend. The total number of spring SDSs decreased from at least ten events per year before 2011 to less than ten events per year after 2011. The overall average annual variation of the surface dust concentration in the main dust source regions decreased 33.24 mu g/m(3) (-1.75%) annually. The variation in the temperatures near and below the ground surface and the amount of precipitation and soil moisture all favored an improvement in vegetation coverage, which reduced the intensity and frequency of SDSs. The strong winds accompanying the influx of cold air from high latitudes showed a decreasing trend, leading to a decrease in the number of SDSs and playing a key role in the decadal decrease of SDSs. The decrease in the intensity of the polar vortex during study period was closely related to the decrease in the intensity and frequency of SDSs. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据