3.8 Proceedings Paper

Sustainable technologies and innovation for green corridors: Survey and application

期刊

TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA 2012
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 1753-1763

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1150

关键词

Green Corridors; Sustainable Technologies; ICT; KPI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A set of transport corridors within the European Area has been selected on the basis of the TEN-T priority projects, the Pan European Transport Network and project partner's proposals. This set of corridors is a workable sample of the European network sufficiently representative to validate the project methodology. Attention was then focused on the definition of a set of performance indicators (KPI) to be used for the evaluation of services on these corridors. A survey to identify sustainable technology candidates for the greening of the corridors has been performed, and the most suitable ones for the possible applications have been selected. Such technologies have been characterized by a set of specific parameters and their applicability to the corridors has been represented by means of a Technology vs Application Matrix. The technologies have been also characterized by their impact on the green aspect of the corridors in terms of variation of the aforementioned KPI. This evaluation has been performed using a qualitative approach. A tool for the definition and comparison of different scenarios of technologies applied on corridors has also been developed. Presently the technology application phase and the consequent development of the scenarios are on going and preliminary results on the Brenner Corridor selected as the Pilot Scenario are available. The aforementioned activities are part of the project Supporting EU's Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan on Green Corridors Issues (in short SuperGreen), which is co-funded by the European Commission within the scope of the 7th Framework Programme. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of the Programme Committee of the Transport Research Arena 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据