4.3 Article

Prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity in older adults from 10 European countries from 2005 to 2013

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 522-529

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1403494818764810

关键词

Epidemiologic research design; overweight; obesity; body mass index; older adult; ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Overweight and obesity are clinical public-health concerns worldwide. Amongst older adults, the prevalence of overweight and obesity is considered high. The purpose of this study was to provide current data regarding the prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity of adults from 2005 to 2013 in 10 European countries. Methods: The data used in the present study were derived from the first, second, fourth and fifth waves of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The present study includes individuals aged 50years from 10 European countries. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported height and weight (kg/m(2)). Results: The general prevalence of overweight (BMI 25 kg/m(2)) was slightly above 60% and remained stable between 2005 (60.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 59.3-60.9%) and 2013 (60.3%, 95% CI: 59.7-60.9%). On the other hand, the prevalence of obesity (BMI 30 kg/m(2)) increased significantly (1.6 points, 95% CI: 0.7-2.6) from 17.5% in 2005 to 19.2% in 2013. Although the prevalence of obesity increased in most countries, the only significant increase was observed in Germany (5.8 points, 95% CI: 1.8-9.9). Spain was the only country where the prevalence of obesity decreased significantly (-4.7 points, 95% CI: -8.8 to -0.5). Sex and age differences are reported. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of overweight was stable, the prevalence of obesity rose. Based on the data currently available for Europe, the prevalence of obesity in European older adults has already reached epidemic proportions, which reinforces the need for the development of effective healthy lifestyle programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据