3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Comparative Study on the Influence of Automated Evaluation System and Teacher Grading on Students' English Writing

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.077

关键词

automated evaluation system; writing feedback; teacher grading; writing proficiency; comparative study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the influence of Writing Roadmap (TM) 2.0 (WRM) and teacher grading on student A and Student B respectively. By comparing the grades of pre-tests of both students, we found that, in the post-test essays, student A demonstrated much achievement in word choice, fluency and conventions while student B showed little improvement in these three dimensions. Compared with student B, student A's essay was superior to that of student B in the above three dimensions as well. The comparative research indicates that the feedback given by the WRM helped student A improve his writing proficiency effectively, especially in word choice, syntax, spelling and grammar. But the system couldn't provide student A with enough feedback and revision suggestions on ideas and contents as well as organization. On the contrary, the global scoring adopted by the teacher could only provide student B with limited feedback, thus was of little help to improve his writing quality. (c) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Harbin University of Science and Technology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据