期刊
2012 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 993-997出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.077
关键词
automated evaluation system; writing feedback; teacher grading; writing proficiency; comparative study
This paper studies the influence of Writing Roadmap (TM) 2.0 (WRM) and teacher grading on student A and Student B respectively. By comparing the grades of pre-tests of both students, we found that, in the post-test essays, student A demonstrated much achievement in word choice, fluency and conventions while student B showed little improvement in these three dimensions. Compared with student B, student A's essay was superior to that of student B in the above three dimensions as well. The comparative research indicates that the feedback given by the WRM helped student A improve his writing proficiency effectively, especially in word choice, syntax, spelling and grammar. But the system couldn't provide student A with enough feedback and revision suggestions on ideas and contents as well as organization. On the contrary, the global scoring adopted by the teacher could only provide student B with limited feedback, thus was of little help to improve his writing quality. (c) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Harbin University of Science and Technology
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据