4.7 Article

Effect of Water Infiltration, Injection Rate and Anisotropy on Hydraulic Fracturing Behavior of Granite

期刊

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 575-589

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1431-3

关键词

Hydraulic fracturing; Sleeve fracturing; Injection rate; Water infiltration; Anisotropy; CT image

资金

  1. International Research Program of Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) [N0002098, 691728]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [N0002098] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydraulic fracturing tests on Pocheon granite cylinders at seven different injection rates varying from 1 to 100 mm(3)/s were conducted. They were compared with sleeve fracturing tests in which borehole was sleeved, and therefore, water infiltration influence was excluded. Hydraulic fracturing behavior of granite is significantly influenced by water infiltration, which is closely related to the preexisting microcracks in granite as well as the cleavage anisotropy. There was a threshold injection rate to fracture the granite specimen under given stress conditions. When the injection rate is below the threshold, water infiltrated granite matrix with slow increment of injection pressure, and the specimen finally reached a full saturation without fracturing. Injection pressure developed nonlinearly with time during water infiltration, while approximately linearly when infiltration was excluded. For both hydraulic and sleeve fracturing tests, breakdown pressure increases with increasing injection rate. The breakdown pressures by sleeve fracturing were more than two times higher than those in hydraulic fracturing. X-ray computed tomography (CT) observations show that induced fractures are along the weaker cleavage parallel to the direction of the vertical stress. The higher breakdown pressure results in a larger aperture of fractures in hydraulic fracturing tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据