4.5 Article

In-hospital cardiac arrest after a rapid response team review: A matched case-control study

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 98-103

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.007

关键词

In-hospital cardiac arrest; Rapid response team; National early warning score

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Study the incidence and reasons behind in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCAs) after rapid response team (RRT) reviews. Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. Data on adult patients who were triaged to remain on general ward after first (index) RRT review without treatment limitations but who suffered an IHCA within the following 48 h were prospectively collected for 5.3 years. These cases were matched (age +/- 3 years, sex, surgical/medical ward, admission year) at a 1:4 ratio to controls (no ICHA after RRT review). Results: Of 2653 index RRT reviews, 17 patients suffered an IHCA on general ward within the 48 h after review. Their 30-day mortality rate was 88%. The incidence was 6.3/1000 index RRT reviews or 4.6/100,000 hospital admissions. Patients who suffered an IHCA within 48 h after RRT review were more likely to have a preceding ICU admission, and their median national early warning scores (NEWSs) at the end of the index RRT reviews (=last NEWSs) were higher than those of the controls. Higher last NEWS was the only factor associated with ICHA after RRT review (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.49, p=0.048) in a conditional multivariable regression model. Conclusions: IHCA within 48 h after an index RRT review on general ward is a rare event with poor prognosis. It is independently associated with higher NEWS at the end of the index RRT review. Careful consideration is stressed, when patients with high NEWS are left on ward after RRT reviews.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据