4.7 Article

Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling relationship between coal consumption and economic growth in China

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 454-462

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.021

关键词

Coal consumption; LMDI method; Decoupling analysis; China

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XKMS089]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [71403266]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M541752, 2015M580484, 2016T90517]
  4. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper has four purposes. Firstly, the status of coal production and consumption is analyzed. Secondly, the temporal and spatial evolution of the coal consumption in China is studied. Furthermore, the LMDI method is used to explore the factors influencing coal consumption in China. Finally, a new decoupling index is developed based on the decomposition results, which is used to study the decoupling relationship between coal consumption and economic growth in China. This paper draws the following results: (1) Coal for transformation consumption gradually exceeded that for end-use over the study period. During 1991-2013, power generation was the biggest coal consumer among all transformation sectors. Among all end-use sectors, industry sector was the biggest coal consumer. (2) In 1991, Liaoning province was the biggest coal consumer. However, the biggest coal consumer was Shandong in 2013. The center of gravity for coal, consumption was an overall movement towards the southwest. (3) The energy intensity effect played the dominant role in decreasing coal consumption over the study period. However, The economic activity effect and population effect maked the continual increase of coal consumption in China. (4) Only three decoupling statuses occurred over the study period: weak decoupling, expansive coupling, and expansive negative decoupling. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据