4.7 Article

Taking an ecosystem services approach for a new national park system in China

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 136-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.030

关键词

National park; Ecosystem services; Institutional change; Socio-ecological system; Science-policy-practice interface

资金

  1. WWF China
  2. Luc Hoffmann Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Chinese leadership has formally proposed that the national park system should initiate an institutional change of conservation management by reforming the governance system and management mechanism. The principle of ecological protection first and public welfare a priority indicates that both biodiversity and ecosystem services are essential. The China national parks for people project was, therefore, launched to practice an ecosystem services approach in national park planning so that scientists, practitioners and decision makers could communicate using a science-policy-practice interface (SPPI). By linking ecosystem services to the social demand of their beneficiaries through the economic definition, we set a conceptual framework for China national park construction that may also be applicable to other developing countries facing similar conservation challenges so that rural livelihood is not negligible regarding conservation. This study focuses on reducing tradeoffs between ecosystem services that are important for local livelihood and that are, generally, public goods in a national park pilot. A technical route is proposed starting from the identification of beneficiaries through to regulating community behaviour using ecosystem services mapping, assessment and governance analyses. It is hypothesized that this approach will assist in national park zoning and land management, and this approach is designed to trigger increased discussion on benefit sharing in future national parks, e.g., the Wuyishan pilot, where this research was performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据