4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Using a Support Vector Machine and a Land Surface Model to Estimate Large-Scale Passive Microwave Brightness Temperatures Over Snow-Covered Land in North America

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2325780

关键词

Advanced microwave scanning radiometer (AMSR-E); brightness temperature; land assimilation; modeling; passive microwave (PMW); remote sensing; snow; support vector machines (SVMs)

资金

  1. Minta Martin Foundation
  2. NASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A support vector machine (SVM), a machine learning technique developed from statistical learning theory, is employed for the purpose of estimating passive microwave (PMW) brightness temperatures over snow-covered land in North America as observed by the advanced microwave scanning radiometer (AMSR-E) satellite sensor. The capability of the trained SVM is compared relative to the artificial neural network (ANN) estimates originally presented in [ 16]. The results suggest that the SVM outperforms the ANN at 10.65, 18.7, and 36.5 GHz for both vertically and horizontally polarized PMW radiation. When compared against daily AMSR-E measurements not used during the training procedure and subsequently averaged across the North American domain over the 9-year study period, the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in the SVM output is 8 K or less, while the anomaly correlation coefficient is 0.7 or greater. When compared relative to the results from the ANN at any of the six frequency and polarization combinations tested, the RMSE was reduced by more than 18%, while the anomaly correlation coefficient was increased by more than 52%. Furthermore, the temporal and spatial variability in the modeled brightness temperatures via the SVM more closely agrees with that found in the original AMSR-E measurements. These findings suggest that the SVM is a superior alternative to the ANN for eventual use as a measurement operator within a data assimilation framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据