期刊
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 201-207出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.04.047
关键词
Cancer; Fertility preservation; Oocyte vitrification; Ovarian reserve; Ovarian stimulation
Research Question: Does ovarian reserve and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in women with cancer undergoing oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation vary according to the type of malignancy? Design: Retrospective cohort study including 105 women aged between 18 and 40 years, who were referred for fertility preservation loocyte vitrification) between 2013 and 2016. The women were divided into three groups: breast cancer, lymphoma or other cancer. All of them had been recently diagnosed with cancer, with gonadotoxic treatment scheduled, and had oocyte vitrification after ovarian stimulation with antagonist protocol. Results: Baseline antral follicle count and anti-Miillerian hormone were no different between women with breast cancer, lymphoma or other cancer. The number of cancelled cycles for poor ovarian response was similar between the groups. The number of FSH units per mature oocyte, the number of mature oocytes (metaphase II) retrieved, and the oocyte maturity rate were not significantly different between the three groups. Conclusions: As the type of cancer does not seem to significantly affect ovarian reserve and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation, our results do not support the relevance of integrating this parameter when establishing ovarian stimulation protocol for oocyte vitrification cycle in women with cancer. (C) 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据