4.3 Article

Regulation by 3,5,3′-tri-iodothyronine and FSH of cytochrome P450 family 19 (CYP19) expression in mouse granulosa cells

期刊

REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1225-1233

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RD17362

关键词

steroid hormone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671555, 31300958]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [5142003]
  3. Scientific Research Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [KM201610028011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytochrome P450 family 19 (CYP19) plays an important role in follicular development, which is regulated by FSH. Although 3,5,3'-tri-iodothyronine (T-3) combines with FSH to induce preantral follicle growth and granulosa cell development, the mechanism involved remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which thyroid hormone (TH) and FSH regulate CYP19 expression and sterol biosynthesis during preantral follicle growth. Mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with eCG (Equine chorionic gonadotropin). The results showed that eCG increased CYP19 expression in ovarian cells. CYP19 expression in granulosa cells was increased after FSH treatment, and this response was enhanced by T-3. Knockdown of CYP19 significantly decreased granulosa cell viability and hormone-stimulated proliferation. In addition, CYP19 knockdown also blocked T-3-and FSH-induced oestradiol (E-2) synthesis in granulosa cells. Furthermore, activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway was required for T-3 and FSH regulation of CYP19 expression. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that CYP19 is important for T-3-and FSH-induced granulosa cell development in the early stages. CYP19 could be a downstream effector of the PI3K/Akt pathway in regulating TH and FSH during follicular development and sterol biosynthesis. The findings suggest that CYP19 is a novel mediator of T-3-and FSH-induced follicular development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据