4.7 Article

Dynamic performance of an aiming control methodology for solar central receivers due to cloud disturbances

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 355-367

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.019

关键词

Solar central receiver; Heliostat aiming; Multivariable closed control loop; Concentrating solar thermal; Cloud disturbances

资金

  1. COLCIENCIAS
  2. Doctoral Scholarship Program [727-2015]
  3. Universidad del Norte
  4. Australian Solar Thermal Research Initiative (ASTRI)
  5. Australian Government through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An appropriate control of the heat flux distribution over the solar central receiver is essential to achieve an efficient and safe operation of solar tower systems. High solar radiation variation due to moving clouds may cause failures to the solar receiver. This paper shows a dynamic performance analysis of a solar central receiver operating when short-time cloud passages partially shade the solar field. The solar receiver incorporates an aiming methodology based on a closed loop model predictive control approach. The DNI changes are simulated using an agent-based model that closely emulates the transients in solar radiation caused by clouds. These models are coupled with a solar system model that resembles the Gemasolar solar plant. The simulations showed that the base feedback loop aiming strategy could successfully restore the solar receiver back to its steady state after transient operations caused by clouds. However, undesired overshoots in incident flux density and high heating rates in the controlled variables were found. These issues are overcome through a setpoint readjustment approach, which is temporally supported by a P1 controller. The results show that the proposed aiming control strategy can provide a continuous safe operation of the solar central receiver when subject to transient flux distribution due to clouds. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据