4.7 Article

Wave energy characterization and assessment in the US Gulf of Mexico, East and West Coasts with Energy Event concept

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 312-322

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.047

关键词

Wave energy; Characterization; Assessment; Energy Event; WaveWatch III

资金

  1. Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  2. COTACYT (Consejo Tamaulipeco de Ciencia y Tecnologia)
  3. CONACYT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia) [399134]
  4. National Science Foundation [EEC-1359414]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers [1359414] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wave energy is one of the most concentrated ocean renewable energy resources. Although wave energy has been studied extensively for more than four decades, there is no large commercial installation for wave energy production or a consensus framework on how to exploit this resource. Wave energy is a complex resource that directly depends on two meteorological parameters, which produced significant fluctuations of wave energy in both temporal and spatial criteria. This paper presents a new concept called Energy Event, to analyze meteorological data generated by WaveWatch III over 36 years in the U.S. to characterize and assess wave energy behavior using the peak-over-threshold methodology. This methodology used extreme statistics, segmented the wave energy with different thresholds, and assessed wave energy production on a temporal and spatial framework. Three areas were studied in this paper, including the Gulf of Mexico, the East and West U.S. Coasts. The results indicated that wave energy behaved as a two-state energy system with each state having independent characteristics. The main difference among the three studied areas was the constant baseline of wave power density, with the West Coast having the highest constant baseline and the Gulf of Mexico having the lowest baseline. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据