4.8 Review

Palm oil mill effluent (POME) as raw material for biohydrogen and methane production via dark fermentation

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 676-684

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.031

关键词

POME; Dark fermentation; Biological hydrogen; Biological methane; Organic load reduction; Integrative process

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [1483847, 1664262, 1558883]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [3128842015-0]
  3. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro - Carlos Chagas Filho (FAPERJ) [E-26/010.001659/2014]
  4. Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and communication (MCTIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Palm Oil industry is growing faster, as the global demand for its products greatly overcomes its production. As palm oil production increases, also does its effluent, Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). POME is a complex effluent, which is not toxic, but due to its elevated organic content, it is considered extremely polluting. Generally, POME is submitted to both physical and chemical treatments before being discarded into receiving streams or other water bodies. This process might be costly for the industry and there 98is no income from effluent treatment, therefore another destination for this effluent is desirable. As an alternative, this residue could be exploited as raw material in biological processes, specially hydrogen and methane production, due to the presence of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins that might be metabolized during the dark fermentation process. Hydrogen can be used in different industries, such as chemical, biochemical and food industries. Methane is an important combustible, which could substitute natural gas and hydrogen as a very promising fuel. This review approaches sustainable and renewable processes for POME exploitation as raw material for renewable energy production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据