4.8 Review

The characteristics and performance of hybrid redox flow batteries with zinc negative electrodes for energy storage

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 992-1016

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.016

关键词

Air electrode; Bromine; Energy storage; Nickel; Redox flow battery; Zinc

资金

  1. CONACYT [314057]
  2. Research Institute for Industry of the University of Southampton
  3. College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences in the University of Exeter
  4. EPSRC
  5. EPSRC Supergen Energy Storage Project [EP/P003494/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/P003494/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P003494/1, 1636456] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc negative electrodes are well known in primary batteries based on the classical Leclanche cell but a more recent development is the introduction of a number of rechargeable redox flow batteries for pilot and commercial scale using a zinc/zinc ion redox couple, in acid or alkaline electrolytes, or transformation of surface zinc oxides as a reversible electrode. The benefits and limitations of zinc negative electrodes are outlined with examples to discuss their thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics along with their practical aspects. Four main types of redox flow batteries employing zinc electrodes are considered: zinc-bromine, zinc-cerium, zinc-air and zinc-nickel. Problems associated with zinc deposition and dissolution, especially in acid media, are summarized. The main features of each battery are identified and the benefits of a flowing electrolyte are explained. In each case, a summary of their development, the electrode and cell reactions, their potentials, the performance of the positive and negative electrodes, the advantages of a single flow compartment and cell developments for energy storage are included. Remaining challenges are highlighted and possibilities for future advances in redox flow batteries are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据