4.8 Review

Selection principles and thermophysical properties of high temperature phase change materials for thermal energy storage: A review

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 1771-1786

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.271

关键词

Thermal energy storage (TES); Phase change material (PCM); Thermophysical properties; Material selection; Heat transfer enhancement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51376060]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB251503]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015ZZD09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase change thermal energy storage (TES) is a promising technology due to the large heat capacity of phase change materials (PCM) during the phase change process and their potential thermal energy storage at nearly constant temperature. Although a considerable amount of research has been conducted on medium and low temperature PCMs in recent years, there has been a lack of a similar systematic and integrated study on high temperature PCMs and high temperature thermal energy storage processes. Analyzing the available literature, this review evaluates the selection principles of PCMs and introduces and compares the available popular material selection software options. The thermophysical property data of high temperature PCMs is comprehensively summarized, including high temperature molten salts and metal alloys. Several heat transfer and performance enhancement techniques are summarized and discussed as potential alternative methods to overcome poor thermal conductivity when using high temperature molten salt as the PCM. The common thermophysical property measurement methods used in literature are also summarized and compared. This review gives a broad overview of material selection, innovation and investigation of thermophysical properties for high temperature PCM development, and will be a helpful reference for the design of high temperature phase change TES systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据