4.8 Review

Metabolic engineering and enzyme-mediated processing: A biotechnological venture towards biofuel production - A review

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 436-447

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.070

关键词

Biofuel; Lignocellulose; Enzymatic pretreatment; Metabolic engineering; Synthetic biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing concerns over the unstable and uncertain petro-based reserves, global warming and energy insecurity have led to a resurgence in the development of an environmentally-responsive greener approach for biofuel production. Exploration of renewable bio-resources for producing biofuels as well as industrially-commodity chemicals has become a universal research theme and attracted massive scientist's impetus over the last decade. Inarguably, lignocellulosic biofuel represents a renewable, sustainable, and the sole foreseeable alternative energy source to transportation fuels. Nevertheless, the lignocellulose recalcitrance postures technical hurdles to develop a cost-competitive bio-refinery process. To do this, the fuel-producing microbial hosts and their metabolic pathways must be engineered/tailored and optimized. Protein engineering has been used to amplify the biocatalytic performance of lignocellulose-modifying enzymes, but only a modest outcome has seen in bio-transforming the lignocellulose-to-biofuels than that of its great success in other industrial applications. Recent advancements in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology will provide novel tools for biotechnologists and metabolic engineers to create an efficient and well-performing biocatalyst with desired phenotypes for producing economically viable biofuels. The present review article describes various technical obstacles, advances, and bio-economic aspects in the research arena of lignocellulose to biofuel which is crucial in the future biofuel industry to respond inevitably accelerating oil prices and depleting oil assets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据