4.7 Article

Battery health management for small-size rotary-wing electric unmanned aerial vehicles: An efficient approach for constrained computing platforms

期刊

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 166-178

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.030

关键词

Multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles; Li-Po battery end-of-discharge; Bayesian parameter estimation; Model-based prognostics; Efficient on-board prognostics

资金

  1. CONICYT [CONICYT-PCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2014-63140178]
  2. FONDECYT Chile Grant [1170044]
  3. Advanced Center for Electrical and Electronic Engineering, AC3E [FB0008]
  4. CONICYT PIA [ACT1405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a holistic framework for the design, implementation and experimental validation of Battery Management Systems (BMS) in rotatory-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that allows to accurately (i) estimate the State of Charge (SOC), and (ii) predict the End of Discharge (EOD) time of lithium-polymer batteries in small-size multirotors by using a model-based prognosis architecture that is efficient and feasible to implement in low-cost hardware. The proposed framework includes a simplified battery model that incorporates the electric load dependence, temperature dependence and SOC dependence by using the concept of Artificial Evolution to estimate some of its parameters, along with a novel Outer Feedback Correction Loop (OFCL) during the estimation stage which adjusts the variance of the process noise to diminish bias in Bayesian state estimation and helps to compensate problems associated with incorrect initial conditions in a non-observable dynamic system. Also, it provides an aerodynamic-based characterization of future power consumption profiles. A quadrotor has been used as validation platform. The results of this work will allow making decisions about the flight plan and having enough confidence in those decisions so that the mission objectives can be optimally achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据