4.7 Article

Adaptive SVM-based real-time quality assessment for primer-sealer dispensing process of sunroof assembly line

期刊

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 202-212

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.020

关键词

Quality assessment system; Infrared thermography (IRT); Support vector machine (SVM); Machine learning; Automotive industry

资金

  1. 5th regional S/W convergence business though the Ulsan Business Support Center
  2. National IT Industry Promotion Agency (NIPA) - Ministry of Science, ICT, Future Planning (MSIP)
  3. Ulsan metropolitan city, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quality assessment in many production processes typically relies on manual inspections due to a lack of reference data and an effective method to classify defects in a systematic way. Recently, the real-time, automated approach for product quality assessment has been regarded an important aspect for smart manufacturing applications, such as in the automotive industry. In this research, we suggest a framework to pre-process the data for SVM-based decision making and implement the algorithm in the self-evolving quality assessment system based on the adaptive support vector machine (ASVM) model. An adaptive process is a feedback control that ensures the effectiveness of the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm over time and enables the improvement of SVM-based quality assessment in the real production process. Next, an industrial case study of a primer-sealer dispensing process in a sunroof assembly line of an automobile is illustrated with statistical analysis to verify and validate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed ASVM-based quality assessment system. Defective patterns are then analyzed using an infrared thermal image of primer-sealer dispensing in a manufacturing process, which contains multi-modal data of dimensional information and temperature deviation from the dispending patterns in our study. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据