4.7 Article

Inverse Retrieval of Chlorophyll From Reflected Spectra for Assimilating Branches of Drought-Tolerant Tamarix ramosissima

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2419225

关键词

Calibration; chlorophyll; inversion; PROSPECT; Tamarix ramosissima

资金

  1. 973 Program [2012CB956204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371364]
  3. CAS project [1074041001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaf chlorophyll content is a critical indicator for the better understanding of the featured carbon cycle and ecosystem functions in arid regions. The potential applicability of the inverse retrieval of chlorophyll via the radiative transfer model PROSPECT has been intensively examined in this study for a dominant species in desert ecosystems, Tamarix ramosissima, in central Asia, which has distinct structural features of xeromorphism and its young twig functioned as assimilating organisms. This study revealed that the performance of the inverse retrieval based on the original version of PROSPECT-4 was poor with very low accuracy. As a comparison, its calibrated version was capable of accurate retrieval of chlorophyll content, which recorded an R-2 (coefficient of determination) of 0.47 with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 28.79 mg/m(2), over the entire measured chlorophyll range, from 57.37 to 202.27 mg/m(2). The model calibration is not considered to be overfitting since the tenfold cross-validation shows a close RMSE value of 26.19 mg/m(2). The effects of the percentage of training dataset for calibration and the number of calibration repeats have also been intensively investigated in this study. Despite some inherent defects of applying broadleaf-oriented PROSPECT on assimilating branches, it remains a feasible selection to inversely retrieve the chlorophyll content from the reflectance and thus provides a base for investigating the chlorophyll content of desert plants using hyperspectral remote sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据