4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Mapping patterns of locoregional recurrence following contemporary treatment with radiation therapy for breast cancer: A multi-institutional validation study of the ESTRO consensus guideline on clinical target volume

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 126, 期 1, 页码 139-147

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.031

关键词

Breast cancer recurrence; Clinical target volume; Recurrence patterns; Radiation therapy

资金

  1. Korean Radiation Oncology Group [KROG 15-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: To validate the ESTRO guideline on clinical target volume (CTV) delineation for breast cancer using a multi-centre dataset. Materials and methods: Patients with axial imaging of gross locoregional recurrence (LRR) were identified from 10 participating institutions. All patients received RT, albeit not to all regional node. The location of LRR was transferred to the corresponding area on representative axial computed tomography images and compared with ESTRO-CTV. Results: The locations of LRRs in 234 patients with 337 recurrence lesions were mapped. The ESTRO-CTV encompassed 97.6% of all LRRs, except in lymph node level 4 and the pectoralis muscle. Although 8.8% of level 4 failures occurred outside the ESTRO-CTV, cranial to the subclavian artery, all nodes were located within 6 mm cranially. Another 20% occurred posterolateral to anterior scalene muscles; however, 11/16 cases had simultaneous multiple lymph node recurrences, and 8/16 initially had N2-3 tumours. Local recurrence at the pectoralis muscle was prominent in patients undergoing mastectomy but not breast conservation surgery (28% vs. 2.9%, P =.001). Conclusions: Our mapping data demonstrated that the ESTRO-CTV, with some considerations, successfully encompassed most LRRs in patients undergoing contemporary management, thus validating ESTRO-011 to be valuable for highly conformal radiation therapy techniques. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据