3.8 Article

Youth Visitors' Satisfaction in Greek Cultural Heritage Destinations: The Case of Delphi

期刊

TOURISM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 285-306

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2012.747986

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Greece is a country with significant cultural wealth, developed mainly as a mass destination. However, the existing mass form of tourism has become saturated, and the need to move to new markets by offering more diversified products is now imperative. Cultural tourism targeted at young people is a way to satisfy this need. Therefore, more emphasis has to be given to youth preferences. This paper examines the satisfaction levels that youth visitors attach to attributes of a major cultural destination, the archaeological site of Delphi in Greece. The study was based upon quantitative research, through the use of a self-administered questionnaire submitted to people between 15 to 35 years old. Results show that youths are important consumers of culture. They are satisfied with the basic attributes of the site such as monuments, landscape, and accumulated experience. On the other hand, they are less satisfied with man-made interventions such as facilities, amenities, and operational features. The study also indicates that youth visitors of Delphi have different backgrounds than the tourists of Greece in general. Overall, it is concluded that the core assets for developing cultural tourism in Greece, such as the sites and their monuments, are existent and satisfy youth travellers. However, attention must be paid to the effective marketing management of Greek cultural heritage destinations in order to optimise their tourism potential. Therefore, the implications of the study suggest that tourism policy-makers need to recognise youths as a vital segment with great potential regarding cultural tourism and to concentrate on markets that respond positively to cultural heritage destinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据