4.5 Article

Glitazones Exert Multiple Effects on β-Cell Stimulus-Secretion Coupling

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 83, 期 1, 页码 51-60

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.112.081638

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Earlier studies suggest that glitazones exert beneficial effects in patients with type 2 diabetes by directly affecting insulin secretion of beta-cells, besides improving the effectiveness of insulin in peripheral tissues. The effects of glitazones on stimulus-secretion coupling (SSC) are poorly understood. We tested the influence of troglitazone and pioglitazone on different parameters of SSC, including insulin secretion (radioimmunoassay), cell membrane potential, various ion currents (patch-clamp), mitochondrial membrane potential (Delta Psi), and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (fluorescence). Troglitazone exerted stimulatory, inhibitory, or no effects on insulin secretion depending on the drug and glucose concentration. It depolarized the Delta Psi, thus lowering ATP production, which resulted in opening of ATP-dependent K+ channels (K-ATP channels) and reduced insulin secretion. However, it also exerted direct inhibitory effects on K-ATP channels that can explain enhanced insulin secretion. Troglitazone also inhibited the currents through voltage-dependent Ca2+ and K+ channels. Pioglitazone was less effective than troglitazone on all parameters tested. The effects of both glitazones were markedly reduced in the presence of bovine serum albumin. Glitazones exert multiple actions on beta-cell SSC that have to be considered as undesired side effects because the influence of these compounds on beta-cells is not controllable. The final effect on insulin secretion depends on many parameters, including the actual glucose and drug concentration, protein binding of the drug, and the drug by itself. Troglitazone and pioglitazone differ in their influence on SSC. It can be assumed that the effects of pioglitazone on beta-cells are negligible under in vivo conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据