3.8 Article

The prevalence and associated risk factors for tooth wear and dental erosion in 15- to 16-year-old schoolchildren in Amman, Jordan

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-012-0006-3

关键词

Tooth wear; Dental erosion; Children; Prevalence; Risk factors

资金

  1. British Council
  2. Deanship of Academic Research at The University of Jordan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Tooth wear and acid erosion have not been previously investigated in Jordanian schoolchildren. Aim To determine the prevalence of tooth wear and associations for a range of dietary and behavioural risk factors. Methods A sample of 1,602 children aged between 15 and 16 years were randomly selected from 32 schools in Amman, Jordan. Tooth wear was measured using the modified Tooth Wear Index and dichotomised on the presence or absence of exposed dentine. Analysis of questionnaire items was performed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results Dentine was exposed in 51 % of children, and males (59 %) had significantly more tooth wear than females (42 %), OR = 1.9, 95 % CI 1.6, 2.4, p < 0.0001. Over 40 % of children had dentine exposed occlusally, mainly the lower first molars, and less than 1 % of the children had dentine exposed palatally. Daily consumption of oranges, ketchup, olives and sweetened coffee was associated with tooth wear through enamel to expose dentine. Carbonated drinks (fizzy) were on the borderline of significance at p = 0.055. The mean DMFT (5.52) was significantly greater in children without tooth wear compared to children with tooth wear (4.13) (p < 0.001). DMFT, gender, daily consumption of oranges and daily consumption of ketchup were significantly associated with tooth wear in the multiple regression model. Conclusion In this sample of children resident in Amman, Jordan, males had significantly more tooth wear than females. The acidic dietary items associated with tooth wear and, thus, dental erosion included oranges, olives and tomato ketchup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据