4.4 Article

No side-effects of single intranasal oxytocin administration in middle childhood

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 235, 期 8, 页码 2471-2477

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-4945-1

关键词

Oxytocin; Side-effects; Middle childhood; Randomized controlled trial; Intranasal administration

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G.0774.15, G.0757.18]
  2. Research Fund KU Leuven [CREA/12/004]
  3. Advanced Grant from the European Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Despite growing interest in the (therapeutic) use of intranasal oxytocin administration in children, the potential side-effects of intranasal oxytocin have remained largely unclear to date. The current study is the first double-blind randomized controlled trial to examine side-effects following single administration of oxytocin nasal spray in elementary school-aged children. One hundred children (8-12 years old) were randomly assigned to receive oxytocin or placebo nasal spray. We assessed side-effects by means of a standardized, drug-specific questionnaire and an open-ended question at two time points: 90 min after nasal spray administration and 24 h after administration. There were no significant associations between nasal spray condition and total frequency of reported side-effects or reports of specific side-effects. Children and their mothers were unable to correctly guess nasal spray allocation, further supporting that the subjective experience of oxytocin versus placebo nasal spray effects was similar. Moreover, the majority of reported side-effects were classified as mild and ceased within 24 h after the procedure, indicating that the nasal sprays were well tolerated. In all, this study is the first randomized controlled trial to provide information on the safety of intranasal oxytocin administration in middle childhood. The current study suggests that single administration of intranasal oxytocin is likely safe in elementary school-aged children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据