4.7 Article

A Bayesian model comparison approach to test the specificity of visual integration impairment in schizophrenia or psychosis

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 271-278

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.061

关键词

Visual processing; Schizoaffective disorder; Bipolar disorder; Transdiagnostic; Neurocognition

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5KL2TR000434]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [K23MH108823]
  3. American Psychological Foundation
  4. University of Michigan Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impaired visual integration is well documented in schizophrenia and related to functional outcomes. However, it is unclear if this deficit is specific to schizophrenia, or characteristic of psychosis more broadly. To address this question, this study used a Bayesian model comparison approach to examine the evidence of three grouping models of visual integration performance in 116 individuals with schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective disorder (SA), bipolar disorder (BD) with or without a history of prominent psychosis (BDP + and BDP-, respectively), or no psychiatric diagnosis (healthy controls; HC). We compared: (1) Psychosis Model (psychosis, non-psychosis), where the psychosis group included SZ, SA, and BDP +, and the non-psychosis group included BDP- and HC; (2) Schizophrenia Model (SZ, non-SZ); and (3) DSM Model (SZ, SA, BD, HC). The relationship between visual integration and general cognition was also explored. The Psychosis Model showed the strongest evidence, and visual integration was associated with general cognition in participants with psychosis. The results were consistent with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, indicating that visual integration impairment is characteristic of psychosis and not specific to SZ or DSM categories, and may share similar disease pathways with observed neurocognitive deficits in psychotic disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据