4.7 Article

Perceived provider stigma as a predictor of mental health service users' internalized stigma and disempowerment

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 526-531

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.036

关键词

Perceived stigma; Internalized stigma; Mental health professionals; Mental health service users; Empowerment

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [K01MH079128, R01MH109413]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K01MH079128, R01MH109413] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite increasing awareness of stigma from mental health service providers as a barrier to recovery, little research has directly examined how it might influence the service users' self-perceptions and treatment experience. The present study examined the association of service users' perceived provider stigma with their experience of internalized stigma and disempowerment, two psychosocial constructs known to hinder recovery. Mental health service users (N = 350) completed questionnaires assessing perceived stigma from mental health service providers, including perceptions of negative affective reactions towards individual users and desired social distance towards people with mental illnesses across various life domains, internalized stigma, and disempowerment (i.e., diminished self-efficacy and mastery) in mental health treatment settings. Structural equation modeling showed that both perceived negative affective reactions and perceived social distance were positively associated with disempowerment. Furthermore, these associations were significantly mediated by internalized stigma. These findings illuminate how perceived stigma from providers can get under the skin of mental health service users and contribute to their overall sense of disempowerment in mental health settings. They also highlight the need for future stigma reduction interventions to specifically target the attitudes and beliefs held by mental health professionals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据