4.5 Article

Increase of frontal cerebral blood volume during transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression is related to treatment effectiveness: A pilot study with near-infrared spectroscopy

期刊

PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 602-610

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcn.12680

关键词

frontal cerebral blood volume; hemoglobin concentration; major depressive disorder; near-infrared spectroscopy during transcranial magnetic stimulation; treatment effectiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Alterations of cerebral blood flow have been reported in studies of depression treated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, the relation between these changes in activity during stimulation and the effectiveness of TMS is not known. The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in frontal cerebral blood volume measured as frontal hemoglobin concentration (fHbC) during TMS are correlated with clinical outcomes of treatment. Methods: Fifteen drug-resistant patients with depression underwent a standard treatment regimen of TMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We recorded fHbC during stimulation at the start and end of the TMS treatment series using near-infrared spectroscopy. Symptom severity was determined using the Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale. Results: At the start of the TMS series, fHbC increased during stimulation in a majority of patients with no relation to symptom severity. However, at the end of the series, fHbC increase during stimulation was negatively correlated with the Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale score and positively with the score reduction. Patients showing a decreasing response of fHbC during TMS at the end of the series experienced less clinical improvement. Conclusion: These results suggest that the maintenance of frontal activation during stimulation in the course of TMS series is related to the effectiveness in the treatment of depression. Measurement of fHbC during stimulation is informative in the clinical use of TMS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据