4.8 Review

Poly(lactic acid) mass transfer properties

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 85-121

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.008

关键词

Migration; Permeability; Solubility; Diffusion; PLA; Partition coefficient

资金

  1. College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (CANR)
  2. School of Packaging (SOP)
  3. CONACYT
  4. Mexican Secretariat of Public Education (SEP)
  5. Mexican Government
  6. USDA NIFA
  7. MI AgBioResearch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), a biodegradable and compostable polymer, is gaining market acceptance and has been extensively investigated. The versatility of PLA has led to its broad and different applications in medical, agriculture, and food packaging fields. Similar to other polymers, PLA is permeable to gases, vapors and organic compounds. Thus, the mass transfer properties of PLA can influence its suitability for end-use applications. Here, we present a comprehensive, systematic, and critical review of more than 300 papers published since 1990 reporting the mass transfer properties of PLA, which include permeability, diffusion and solubility to gases, water vapor and organic vapors, along with migration of chemical compounds from PLA. Overall, PLA provides moderate barrier to gases, water vapor, and organic compounds. Barrier enhancement can be achieved through modifications such as blending with other polymers and formation of composite structures. Most of the mass transfer parameters reported in the literature are based on two-phase mobile amorphous and crystalline fractions, omitting the role of the restricted amorphous fraction, which can lead to unclear comprehension of PLA barrier properties as well as what affects those properties. Additional research is needed to address this shortcoming. This review provides an in-depth analysis of PLA mass transfer and a foundation for future research and commercial development. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据