4.8 Review

Review on superior strength and enhanced ductility of metallic nanomaterials

期刊

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 462-540

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.002

关键词

Strength; Ductility; Nanostructured materials; Metals; Deformation; Fracture; Dislocations; Grain boundaries; Twins; Heterostructure

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-29-00199]
  2. Russian Federal Ministry for Education and Science [14.B25.31.0017]
  3. U.S. Army Research Office [W911 NF-17-1-0350]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0204403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured metallic materials having nanocrystalline and ultrafine-grained structures show exceptional mechanical properties, e.g. superior strength, that are very attractive for various applications. However, superstrong metallic nanomaterials typically have low ductility at ambient temperatures, which significantly limits their applications. Nevertheless, several examples of nanostructured metals and alloys with concurrent high strength and good ductility have been reported. Such strong and ductile materials are ideal for a broad range of structural applications in transportation, medicine, energy, etc. Strong and ductile metallic nanomaterials are also important for functional applications where these properties are critical for the lifetime of nanomaterial-based devices. This article presents an overview of experimental data and theoretical concepts addressing the unique combination of superior strength and enhanced ductility of metallic nanomaterials. We consider the basic approaches and methods for simultaneously optimizing their strength and ductility, employing principal deformation mechanisms, crystallographic texture, chemical composition as well as second-phase nano-precipitates, carbon nanotubes and graphene. Examples of achieving such superior properties in industrial materials are reviewed and discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据