4.8 Article

Identification of a new subset of lymph node stromal cells involved in regulating plasma cell homeostasis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712628115

关键词

FRC subsets; lymph node medulla; extrafollicular B cell differentiation; plasma cell survival; humoral response

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003-146944/1]
  2. Taiwan National Science Council [NSC 100-2917-I-564-005]
  3. French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer [EL2014.LNCC/ED]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [CHEMIMMUN ANR-13-BSV3-0010]
  5. Cancer Research for Personalized Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibody-secreting plasma cells (PCs) arise rapidly during adaptive immunity to control infections. The early PCs are retained within the reactive lymphoid organ where their localization and homeostasis rely on extrinsic factors, presumably produced by local niche cells. While myeloid cells have been proposed to form those niches, the contribution by colocalizing stromal cells has remained unclear. Here, we characterized a subset of fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) that forms a dense meshwork throughout medullary cords of lymph nodes (LNs) where PCs reside. This medullary FRC type is shown to be anatomically, phenotypically, and functionally distinct from T zone FRCs, both in mice and humans. By using static and dynamic imaging approaches, we provide evidence that medullary FRCs are the main cell type in contact with PCs guiding them in their migration. Medullary FRCs also represent a major local source of the PC survival factors IL-6, BAFF, and CXCL12, besides also producing APRIL. In vitro, medullary FRCs alone or in combination with macrophages promote PC survival while other LN cell types do not have this property. Thus, we propose that this FRC subset, together with medullary macrophages, forms PC survival niches within the LN medulla, and thereby helps in promoting the rapid development of humoral immunity, which is critical in limiting early pathogen spread.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据