4.8 Article

Caspase-1 inhibition prevents glial inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in models of multiple sclerosis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1722041115

关键词

pyroptosis; gasdermin D; multiple sclerosis; EAE; inflammasome

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Alberta Innovates (AI)
  3. Queen Elizabeth II Doctoral Scholarship
  4. Campus Alberta Neuroscience
  5. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (MSSoC)
  6. MSSoC
  7. University Hospital Foundation
  8. Canada Foundation for Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS of unknown cause that remains incurable. Inflammasome-associated caspases mediate the maturation and release of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-18 and activate the pore-forming protein gasdermin D (GSDMD). Inflammatory programmed cell death, pyroptosis, was recently shown to be mediated by GSDMD. Here, we report molecular evidence for GSDMD-mediated inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in both myeloid cells (macrophages/microglia) and, unexpectedly, in myelin-forming oligodendrocytes (ODC5) in the CNS of patients with MS and in the MS animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We observed inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in human microglia and ODC5 in vitro after exposure to inflammatory stimuli and demonstrate caspase-1 inhibition by the small-molecule inhibitor VX-765 in both cell types. GSDMD inhibition by siRNA transduction suppressed pyroptosis in human microglia. VX-765 treatment of EAE animals reduced the expression of inflammasome and pyroptosis-associated proteins in the CNS, prevented axonal injury, and improved neurobehavioral performance. Thus, GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis in select glia cells is a previously unrecognized mechanism of inflammatory demyelination and represents a unique therapeutic opportunity for mitigating the disease process in MS and other CNS inflammatory diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据