4.5 Article

Isolation and Characterization of an Algicidal Bacterium Indigenous to Lake Taihu with a Red Pigment able to Lyse Microcystis aeruginosa

期刊

BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 148-154

出版社

CHINESE CENTER DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
DOI: 10.3967/0895-3988.2013.02.009

关键词

Algicidal bacteria; Microcystis aeruginosa; Harmful algal blooms (HABs); Serratia marcescens; Algae-lysing

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2012ZX07101-005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972440]
  3. Jiangsu Province Postgraduate Innovation Project [CX10B-087Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To isolate and characterize indigenous algicidal bacteria and their algae-lysing compounds active against Microcystis aeruginosa, strains TH1, TH2, and FACHB 905. Methods The bacteria were identified using the Biolog automated microbial identification system and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. The algae-lysing compounds were isolated and purified by silica gel column chromatography and reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Their structures were confirmed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Algae-lysing activity was observed using microscopy. Results The algae-lysing bacterium LTH-2 isolated from Lake Taihu was identified as Serratia marcescens. Strain LTH-2 secreted a red pigment identified as prodigiosin (C20H25N3O), which showed strong lytic activity with algal strains M. aeruginosa TH1, TH2, and FACHB 905 in a concentration-dependent manner. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of prodigiosin with the algal strains was 4.8 (+/- 0.4)x10(-2) mu g/mL, 8.9 (+/- 1.1)x10(-2) mu g/mL, and 1.7 (+/- 0.1)x10(-1) mu g/mL in 24 h, respectively. Conclusion The bacterium LTH-2 and its pigment had strong Microcystis-lysing activity probably related to damage of cell membranes. The bacterium LTH-2 and its red pigment are potentially useful for regulating blooms of harmful M. aeruginosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据