4.8 Article

Dynamic action potential clamp predicts functional separation in mild familial and severe de novo forms of SCN2A epilepsy

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800077115

关键词

de novo SCN2A mutation; dynamic action potential clamp; epilepsy; voltage clamp; modeling

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function Grant [CE14010007]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) programme [10915693]
  3. NHMRC Fellowship [GNT1005050]
  4. Practitioner fellowship
  5. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
  6. RogCon, Inc.
  7. Victorian State Government infrastructure funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

De novo variants in SCN2A developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) show distinctive genotype-phenotype correlations. The two most recurrent SCN2A variants in DEE, R1882Q and R853Q, are associated with different ages and seizure types at onset. R1882Q presents on day 1 of life with focal seizures, while infantile spasms is the dominant seizure type seen in R853Q cases, presenting at a median age of 8 months. Voltage clamp, which characterizes the functional properties of ion channels, predicted gain-of-function for R1882Q and loss-of-function for R853Q. Dynamic action potential clamp, that we implement here as a method for modeling neurophysiological consequences of a given epilepsy variant, predicted that the R1882Q variant would cause a dramatic increase in firing, whereas the R853Q variant would cause a marked reduction in action potential firing. Dynamic clamp was also able to functionally separate the L1563V variant, seen in benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures from R1882Q, seen in DEE, suggesting a diagnostic potential for this type of analysis. Overall, the study shows a strong correlation between clinical phenotype, SCN2A genotype, and functional modeling. Dynamic clamp is well positioned to impact our understanding of pathomechanisms and for development of disease mechanism-targeted therapies in genetic epilepsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据