4.8 Article

The C-terminal extension landscape of naturally presented HLA-I ligands

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717277115

关键词

HLA-I-peptide interactions; HLA peptidomics; T cell epitope; HLA-I structures; computational immunology

资金

  1. Center for Advanced Modeling Science (CADMOS)
  2. AbbVie [1097737]
  3. Bayer Pharma AG
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Eshelman Institute for Innovation
  7. Genome Canada
  8. Innovative Medicines Initiative (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations) (ULTRA-DD) [115766]
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck, Co.
  11. Novartis Pharma AG
  12. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  13. Pfizer
  14. Sao Paulo Research Foundation
  15. Takeda
  16. Wellcome Trus [092809/Z/10/Z]
  17. Wellcome Career Development Fellowship [095751/Z/11/Z]
  18. MRC [MR/N010051/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HLA-I molecules play a central role in antigen presentation. They typically bind 9-to 12-mer peptides, and their canonical binding mode involves anchor residues at the second and last positions of their ligands. To investigate potential noncanonical binding modes, we collected in-depth and accurate HLA peptidomics datasets covering 54 HLA-I alleles and developed algorithms to analyze these data. Our results reveal frequent (442 unique peptides) and statistically significant C-terminal extensions for at least eight alleles, including the common HLA-A03:01, HLA-A31:01, and HLA-A68:01. High resolution crystal structure of HLA-A68:01 with such a ligand uncovers structural changes taking place to accommodate C-terminal extensions and helps unraveling sequence and structural properties predictive of the presence of these extensions. Scanning viral proteomes with the C-terminal extension motifs identifies many putative epitopes and we demonstrate direct recognition by human CD8(+) T cells of a 10-mer epitope from cytomegalovirus predicted to follow the C-terminal extension binding mode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据