4.8 Article

Acceleration of tropical cyclogenesis by self-aggregation feedbacks

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719967115

关键词

tropical cyclones; convective aggregation; deep convection; tropical cyclogenesis; tropical cyclone intensification

资金

  1. France-Berkeley Fund
  2. French national program Les Enveloppes Fluides et l'Environnement (LEFE) of Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU)
  3. program Actions Incitatives of Ecole Normale Superieure (ENS)
  4. Grand Equipement National De Calcul Intensif (GENCI), France [A0030110314]
  5. Centre Informatique National de l'Enseignement Superieur (CINES) [A0020107651]
  6. National Science Foundation [1535746]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idealized simulations of tropical moist convection have revealed that clouds can spontaneously clump together in a process called self-aggregation. This results in a state where a moist cloudy region with intense deep convection is surrounded by extremely dry subsiding air devoid of deep convection. Because of the idealized settings of the simulations where it was discovered, the relevance of self-aggregation to the real world is still debated. Here, we show that self-aggregation feedbacks play a leading-order role in the spontaneous genesis of tropical cyclones in cloud-resolving simulations. Those feedbacks accelerate the cyclogenesis process by a factor of 2, and the feedbacks contributing to the cyclone formation show qualitative and quantitative agreement with the self-aggregation process. Once the cyclone is formed, wind-induced surface heat exchange (WISHE) effects dominate, although we find that self-aggregation feedbacks have a small but nonnegligible contribution to the maintenance of the mature cyclone. Our results suggest that self-aggregation, and the framework developed for its study, can help shed more light into the physical processes leading to cyclogenesis and cyclone intensification. In particular, our results point out the importance of the longwave radiative cooling outside the cyclone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据