4.8 Article

Gene regulation and suppression of type I interferon signaling by STAT3 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715118115

关键词

STAT3; interferon; diffuse large B cell lymphoma

资金

  1. University of Wisconsin, Madison
  2. KL2 Scholar Award [UL1TR0000427, KL2TR000428]
  3. National Cancer Institute [1R01 CA187299]
  4. University of Wisconsin, Madison, T32 Hematology Training Award [T32 HL07899]
  5. University of Wisconsin Forward Lymphoma Fund
  6. Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

STAT3 is constitutively activated in many cancers and regulates gene expression to promote cancer cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and migration. In diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), activation of STAT3 and its kinase JAK1 is caused by autocrine production of IL-6 and IL-10 in the activated B cell-like subtype (ABC). However, the gene regulatory mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of this aggressive lymphoma by STAT3 are not well characterized. Here we performed genome-wide analysis and identified 2,251 STAT3 direct target genes, which involve B cell activation, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration. Whole-transcriptome profiling revealed that STAT3 acts as both a transcriptional activator and a suppressor, with a comparable number of up-and down-regulated genes. STAT3 regulates multiple oncogenic signaling pathways, including NF-kappa B, a cell-cycle checkpoint, PI3K/AKT/mTORC1, and STAT3 itself. In addition, STAT3 negatively regulates the lethal type I IFN signaling pathway by inhibiting expression of IRF7, IRF9, STAT1, and STAT2. Inhibition of STAT3 activity by ruxolitinib synergizes with the type I IFN inducer lenalidomide in growth inhibition of ABC DLBCL cells in vitro and in a xenograft mouse model. Therefore, this study provides a mechanistic rationale for clinical trials to evaluate ruxolitinib or a specific JAK1 inhibitor combined with lenalidomide in ABC DLBCL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据