4.6 Review

Traditional Chinese medicine network pharmacology: theory, methodology and application

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 110-120

出版社

CHINESE JOURNAL NATURAL MEDICINES
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1009.2013.00110

关键词

Traditional Chinese medicine; Network pharmacology; Network target; Theory; Methodology; Application

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [81225025, 60934004, 91229201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has a long history of viewing an individual or patient as a system with different statuses, and has accumulated numerous herbal formulae. The holistic philosophy of TCM shares much with the key ideas of emerging network pharmacology and network biology, and meets the requirements of overcoming complex diseases, such as cancer, in a systematic manner. To discover TCM from a systems perspective and at the molecular level, a novel TCM network pharmacology approach was established by updating the research paradigm from the current one target, one drug mode to a new network target, multi-components mode. Subsequently, a set of TCM network pharmacology methods were created to prioritize, disease-associated genes, to predict the target profiles and pharmacological actions of herbal compounds, to reveal drug-gene-disease co-module associations, to screen synergistic multi-compounds from herbal formulae in a high-throughput manner, and to interpret the combinatorial rules and network regulation effects of herbal formulae. The effectiveness of the network-based methods was demonstrated for the discovery of bioactive compounds and for the elucidation of the mechanisms of action of herbal formulae, such as Qing-Luo-Yin and the Liu-Wei-Di-Huang pill. The studies suggest that the TCM network pharmacology approach provides a new research paradigm for translating TCM from an experience-based medicine to an evidence-based medicine system, which will accelerate TCM drug discovery, and also improve current drug discovery strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据