4.6 Article

Counter rotating vortex pair structure in a reacting jet in crossflow

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 1489-1496

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.059

关键词

Jet in cross flow; Tomographic particle image velocimetry; Counter-rotating vortex pair

资金

  1. Air Force Research Laboratory [88ABW-2017-5780, FA8650-15-D-2518, FA8650-18-C-2001]
  2. University Turbine Systems Research [DE-FE0025344]
  3. National Science Foundation [1705649]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1705649] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the time averaged flow structure of a reacting jet in cross flow (RJICF), emphasizing the structure of the counter-rotating vortex pair (CVP) by using simultaneous tomographic particle image velocimetry (TPIV) and hydroxyl radical planar laser induced fluorescence (OH-PLIF). It was performed to determine the extent to which heat release, and the associated effects of gas expansion and baroclinic vorticity production, impact the structure of the CVP. These results show the clear presence of a CVP in the time averaged flow field, whose trajectory lies below the jet centerline on either side of the centerplane. Consistent with other measurements of high momentum flux ratio JICF in nonreacting flows, there is significant asymmetry in strength of the two vortex cores. The strength and structure of the CVP was quantified with vorticity and swirling strength (lambda(ci)), showing that some regions of the flow with high shear are not necessarily accompanied by large scale bulk flow rotation and vice-versa. The OH PLIF measurement allows for correlation of the flame position with the dominant vortical structures, showing that the leeward flame branch lies slightly above, as well as, in the region between the CVP cores. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据