4.6 Article

Analyzing the robustness of the yield sooting index as a measure of sooting tendency

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 911-918

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.105

关键词

Particulates; Premixed flame; Jet fuels; Sooting tendency

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO)
  2. Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) Program [DE-EE0007983]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET 1604983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soot formation from combustion is linked with many issues, ranging from global warming to human health complications. To tackle these problems, measures of sooting tendency that are accurate and robust with respect to flame conditions are needed to facilitate the development of cleaner fuels and combustion technologies. The objective of this research is to analyze the accuracy and robustness of the Yield Sooting Index (YSI), a measure of sooting tendency, under different temperatures and air-to-fuel equivalence ratios (lambda). In this work, the YSI of various cyclic hydrocarbons and jet fuels were measured in several methane/air coflow flames doped with small quantities (0.85% by mass of total fuel) of each test compound using two soot diagnostic techniques, color-ratio pyrometry and line-of-sight spectral radiance. The flame temperature and lambda values of these doped coflow flames were varied by premixing the base methane fuel with varying amounts of nitrogen and/or air. The sensitivity of the measured YSI for the test compounds to the various temperature and lambda conditions for each base flame was analyzed. Our results show that the YSI values of the cyclic hydrocarbons and test fuels were invariant across all the investigated flame conditions, suggesting that the YSI as a measure of sooting tendency is robust across a wide range of premixed air levels and temperatures relevant to soot formation. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据