4.7 Article

In situ formation of TiC-particle-reinforced stainless steel matrix nanocomposites during ball milling: Feedstock powder preparation for selective laser melting at various energy densities

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 467-478

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.11.064

关键词

Mechanical alloying (MA); In situ composites; Selective laser melting (SLM); Hardness; Wear

资金

  1. Saudi Arabia Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

316L-Ti-graphite mixed powders were subjected to mechanical alloying (MA) for milling times ranging from 4 to 35 h. After 24 h of milling, TiC particles began forming in situ within a steel matrix via MA. The TiC phase formed due to the gradual interdiffusion of Ti into the graphite lattice. Evolutions of the phases, microstructure, and composition of the powders with varied milling times were investigated. The results showed that irregularly shaped particles formed initially; these particles flattened after 10 h of milling, coarsened after 24 h of milling, and finally became fine and uniform when milled for >24 h. Micrographs of the 35-h milled feedstock powder showed 20-nm-diameter TiC nanoparticles uniformly distributed in the 316L matrix. Then, the 35-h milled feedstock powders were processed by selective laser melting (SLM), an additive manufacturing process. The effects of the laser energy density (eta) used during SLM on the microstructure, hardness, and tribological behavior of the SLM-processed parts were investigated. TiC particles were uniformly distributed within the steel matrix for all eta values. With increasing eta, however, the microstructure tended to coarsen because of the slower cooling rate. The applied eta also influenced the hardness and wear rate. The hardest samples were obtained at eta of 67 J/mm(3), and the optimum wear resistance was measured at eta of 200 j/mm(3). A continuous, well-adhered strain-hardened tribolayer demonstrated the best wear resistance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据