4.7 Article

Adsorption of heavy metal ions using zeolite materials of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash modified by microwave-assisted hydrothermal treatment

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 335, 期 -, 页码 156-163

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.05.003

关键词

Adsorption; MSWI fly ash; Hydrothermal treatment; Microwave; Heavy metals

资金

  1. Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621005]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51676172]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016FZA4010]
  4. Special Fund for the National Environmental Protection Public Welfare Program [201209023-4]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to University [B08026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, microwave-assisted hydrothermal process was applied to modify the municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash and get zeolitic production. The condition of hydrothermal process was fixed at 200 degrees C and 30 min. The 1 mol/L Na2HPO4 was selected as the additive, and the liquid to solid ratio was 3 ml/g. X-ray diffraction results revealed that analogous zeolite crystals formed by the MSWI fly ash during the hydrothermal process. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was 0.498 meq/g of the modified fly ash, which increased about 22 times compared to the raw MSWI fly ash. To obtain the adsorption mechanism of the modified fly ash, the experiments of adsorption isotherm and kinetics were researched. The adsorption isotherms of heavy metal cations in mixed solution could be described by Langmuir isotherm equations, with a high correlation coefficient value. The experimental products were better fitted by the pseudo second-order kinetics rather than the pseudo first -order kinetics. Although the adsorption capacity of the modified fly ash needs to be promoted, it is a potential utilization for MSWI fly ash to be the original materials as adsorbents. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据