4.7 Article

Does increased nutritional carbon availability in fruit and foliar hosts contribute to modulation of pathogen colonization?

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 27-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.05.001

关键词

Fruit susceptibility; Foliar susceptibility; Pathogenicity; Colonization; Fruit ripening

资金

  1. Binational US-Israel Agricultural Research and Development Fund (BARD)
  2. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [IS-4773-14]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IOS-1557943]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High losses due to postharvest pathogens call for an understanding of the processes modulating fungal colonization in comparison to leaf pathogens. Pathogens can penetrate fruit and foliar plants directly through the cuticle following the development of appressoria, or through wounds during fruit growth and postharvest life. In both cases, disease symptoms may not occur until long after infection. Maturation (when plant or fruit has attained maximum growth and size) and ripening (the process by which mature fruit become ready for consumption) are critical factors in fruit susceptibility to postharvest pathogens. During these periods, fruit undergo physiological and metabolic changes that affect nutritional composition and cause a decline in resistance mechanisms. Recent research suggests that host nutrients during ripening may modulate signaling processes in the pathogen that lead to metabolic responses, triggering the accumulation of pH-modulating molecules. The pH shift in the surrounding host tissue induces optimal gene-expression conditions for the fungus to use specific pathogenicity factors at each particular pH. Leaf pathogens usually penetrate via appressoria and also respond to carbon-regulation signaling. This review describes our understanding of the importance of carbon regulation in fruit and leaf tissue, and its contribution to pathogen colonization via facilitation of the transition from quiescent to necrotrophic lifestyle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据