4.1 Article

Why can't a woman bid more like a man?

期刊

GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 181-213

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.002

关键词

Gender; Menstrual cycle; Contraceptive pills; Auction; Experiment

资金

  1. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0962492] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate gender differences and menstrual cycle effects in first-price and second-price sealed-bid auctions with independent private values in a laboratory setting. We find that women bid significantly higher and earn significantly less than men do in the first-price auction, while we find no evidence of a gender difference in bidding or earnings in the second-price auction. Focusing on the first-price auction, we find that, while the gender gap in bidding and earnings persists over the entire course of the menstrual cycle, bidding of contraceptive pill users follows a sine-like pattern throughout the menstrual cycle, with higher than average bidding in the follicular phase and lower than average bidding in the luteal phase. In comparison, pill non-users have a flat bidding profile throughout the cycle. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据