4.3 Article

King Penguin populations increase on South Georgia but explanations remain elusive

期刊

POLAR BIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1111-1122

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-018-2271-z

关键词

Southern Ocean; High-resolution photography; Population estimate; Glacial retreat; Climate forcing

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs [NSF/OPP-1255058]
  2. One Ocean Expeditions
  3. Cheeseman's Ecological Safaris
  4. Quark Expeditions
  5. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1255058] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While dramatic increases in populations of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) have been documented throughout their range, population changes on the island of South Georgia have not been assessed. We reconstructed time series of population size for six major colonies across South Georgia using historical data stretching back to 1883 and new population estimates derived from direct on-the-ground censuses and oblique, high-resolution digital photographs. We find evidence for a significant increase in the population of King Penguins at all colonies examined over the 124 years of available survey data. We discuss our findings in the context of four established hypotheses explaining King Penguin population growth: (1) favorable changes in the pelagic food web; (2) climate forcing; (3) greater availability of breeding habitat; and (4) the cessation of harvesting. While we do find evidence that glacial retreat may have increased suitable breeding habitat at some colonies and facilitated population expansion, glacial retreat is not associated with all of South Georgia's growing populations. Local anomalies in sea surface temperature have increased in parallel with King Penguin population growth rate, suggesting that climate forcing may contribute to colony growth, but a complete explanation for the island's rapidly growing King Penguin population remains unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据