4.6 Article

Associations between sleep duration, sleep quality and diabetic retinopathy

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196399

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC CIRG/1371/2013, NMRC/STaR/016/2013]
  2. SingHealth Foundation Research [SHF/FG563S/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Abnormal durations of sleep have been associated with risk of diabetes. However, it is not clear if sleep duration is associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods In a cross-sectional study, we included 1,231 (Malay, n = 395; Indian, n= 836) adults (mean age 64.4 +/- 9.0 years, 50.4% female) with diabetes from the second visit of two independent population-based cohort studies (2011-15) in Singapore. Self-reported habitual sleep duration was categorized as short (<6 h), normal (6 <= h <8), and long (>= 8 h). Questionnaires were administered to detect risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), excessive daytime sleepiness, and insomnia, all of which may indicate poor quality of sleep. The associations between sleep-related characteristics with moderate DR and vision-threatening DR (VTDR) were analysed using logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Prevalence of moderate DR and VTDR in the study population were 10.5% and 6.3% respectively. The mean duration of sleep was 6.4 +/- 1.5 h. Compared to normal sleep duration, both short and long sleep durations were associated with moderate DR with multivariable odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.73 (1.03-2.89) and 2.17 (1.28-3.66) respectively. Long sleep duration (2.37 [1.16-4.89]), high risk of OSA (2.24 [1.09-4.75]), and excessive daytime sleepiness (3.27 [1.02-10.30]) were separately associated with VTDR. Conclusion Sleep duration had a U-shaped association with moderate DR; long sleep duration, excessive daytime sleepiness and high risk of OSA were positively associated with VTDR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据