4.6 Article

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver biomarkers and stroke risk: The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke cohort

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194153

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Service [U01 NS041588]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [T32HL-007894]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose Liver disease, particularly non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but little is known about its relationship with ischemic stroke. Methods In the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort of 30,239 American black and white adults, we assessed baseline NAFLD as fatty liver index (FLI) > 60, and assessed liver biomarkers aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT),gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and the AST/ALT ratio and risk of incident ischemic stroke over 5.8 years using a case-cohort study design. Results Considering 572 strokes and a 1,017-person cohort sample, NAFLD was inversely associated with stroke risk in men (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.96), as was being in the highest ALT quintile versus the lowest (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.78) and the highest versus lowest GGT quintile (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.85), but not in women. Conversely, FLI score above the 90 th percentile was associated with increased stroke risk among women (HR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.14-4.47), but not men. AST was not associated with stroke risk in either sex. AST/ALT ratio > 2 was strongly associated with increased stroke risk in whites, but not blacks (HRs: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.42-9.35 and 0.97; 95% CI: 0.45-1.99, respectively; p for interaction = 0.03). Conclusions The relationships between NAFLD, liver biomarkers, and ischemic stroke are complex, and sex and race differences we observed require further study and confirmation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据