相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Frequency and Type of Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review of Basic Biomedical Research Funding Applications: Self-Reporting Versus Manual Detection
Stephen A. Gallo et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2016)
Creating a literature database of low-calorie sweeteners and health studies: evidence mapping
Ding Ding Wang et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2016)
A randomized trial of fellowships for early career researchers finds a high reliability in funding decisions
Philip Clarke et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution
Anna Kaatz et al.
ACADEMIC MEDICINE (2015)
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Adrian G. Barnett et al.
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2015)
Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Michael S. Lauer et al.
CIRCULATION RESEARCH (2015)
Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants
J. M. Doyle et al.
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY (2015)
Factors Impacting Successfully Competing for Research Funding: An Analysis of Applications Submitted to the Plastic Surgery Foundation
Keith M. Hume et al.
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY (2015)
Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research
David G. Pina et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
Mark D. Lindner et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?
Danielle Li et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
Danielle L. Herbert et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
Afton S. Carpenter et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training
David N. Sattler et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers
Richard R. Snell
PLOS ONE (2015)
Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology
Qi Wang et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2015)
Engaging Patients and Stakeholders in Research Proposal Review: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Rachael L. Fleurence et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)
Prior Publication Productivity, Grant Percentile Ranking, and Topic-Normalized Citation Impact of NHLBI Cardiovascular R01 Grants
Jonathan R. Kaltman et al.
CIRCULATION RESEARCH (2014)
Characterization of the Peer Review Network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health
Kevin W. Boyack et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies
Stephen A. Gallo et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Supporting cancer survivors' participation in peer review: perspectives from NCI's CARRA program
Melissa B. Gilkey
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP (2014)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Reviewers' Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?
Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes
Stephen A. Gallo et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
A Community-Academic Partnership to Address Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities through Grant-Making
Michelle A. Ramos et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS (2013)
Networking and Knowledge Exchange to Promote the Formation of Transdisciplinary Coalitions and Levels of Agreement Among Transdisciplinary Peer Reviewers
Rebecca Lobb et al.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE (2013)
Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals
Mikael Fogelholm et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
Hendy Abdoul et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach
Ruediger Mutz et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program
GianLuca Quaglio et al.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG (2011)
Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel
Nicholas Graves et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives
Sara Schroter et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2010)
An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH
Michael R. Martin et al.
PLOS ONE (2010)
Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada
David Campbell et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION (2010)
Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity
Martin Reinhart
SCIENTOMETRICS (2009)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications?
Michael R. Martin et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2008)
Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system
Valen E. Johnson
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2008)
Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2008)
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review
Lutz Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2007)
Developing a collaborative research system for Aboriginal health
Jackie Street et al.
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2007)
An objective rating form to evaluate grant proposals to the hogg foundation for mental health - A pilot study of implementation
Arthur L. Whaley
EVALUATION REVIEW (2006)
Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study
Lutz Bornmann et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2006)
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants
Lutz Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2006)
Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications
Nancy E. Mayo et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Outcomes of national institutes of health peer review of clinical grant applications
TA Kotchen et al.
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE (2006)
Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows - A boolean probit analysis
L Bornmann et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT (2005)
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions
L Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2005)
NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research
TA Kotchen et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)
Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research
SJ Rangel et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2002)
Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals
Y Andejeski et al.
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE (2002)
The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome
L Langfeldt
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE (2001)
Does peer review predict the performance of research projects in health sciences?
LE Claveria et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2000)
分享论文
