4.7 Article

Cysteine: A multifaceted amino acid involved in signaling, plant resistance and antifungal development

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 77-89

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.05.024

关键词

-

资金

  1. State-Region Planning Contracts (CPER)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early effects induced by cysteine were monitored using the model of Mimosa pudica pulvinar cells. Rapid dose dependent membrane depolarization (within seconds) and modification of proton secretion (within minutes) were triggered at cysteine concentrations higher than 0.1 mM. These effects did not result from a modification of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity nor from a protonophore effect as shown by assays on plasma membrane vesicles isolated from pulvinar tissues. In a 0.5-10 mM range, cysteine inhibited the ion-driven turgor-mediated seismonastic reaction of Mimosa pudica primary pulvini and the dark-induced movement of Cassia fasciculata leaflets. At concentrations higher than 1 mM, it induced a long-lasting leaflet necrosis dependent on the concentration and treatment duration. Electron microscopy showed that cysteine induced important damage in the nucleus, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi of the M. pudica motor cell. Cysteine inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner, from 0.5 to 20 mM, both the mycelial growth and the spore germination of the fungal pathogens Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium minimum implicated in esca disease of grapevines. Using [S-35] cysteine, we showed that the amino acid was absorbed following leaf spraying, translocated from leaves to other parts of grapevine cuttings and accumulated within trunks and roots. Therefore, cysteine showed relevant properties to be a candidate able to control fungal diseases either by acting as an early signal directing plant host reaction or/and by acting directly on fungal development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据