4.8 Article

Detection of major loci associated with the variation of 18 important agronomic traits between Solanum pimpinellifolium and cultivated tomatoes

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 312-323

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13952

关键词

Solanum lycopersicum; RILs; agronomic traits; wild species; cultivated species

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100506]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572140, 31171962]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wild species can be used to improve various agronomic traits in cultivars; however, a limited understanding of the genetic basis underlying the morphological differences between wild and cultivated species hinders the integration of beneficial traits from wild species. In the present study, we generated and sequenced recombinant inbred lines (RILs, 201 F-10 lines) derived from a cross between Solanum pimpinellifolium and Solanum lycopersicum tomatoes. Based on a high-resolution recombination bin map to uncover major loci determining the phenotypic variance between wild and cultivated tomatoes, 104 significantly associated loci were identified for 18 agronomic traits. On average, these loci explained similar to 39% of the phenotypic variance of the RILs. We further generated near-isogenic lines (NILs) for four identified loci, and the lines exhibited significant differences for the associated traits. We found that two loci could improve the flower number and inflorescence architecture in the cultivar following introgression of the wild-species alleles. These findings allowed us to construct a trait-locus network to help explain the correlations among different traits based on the pleiotropic or linked loci. Our results provide insights into the morphological changes between wild and cultivated tomatoes, and will help to identify key genes governing important agronomic traits for the molecular selection of elite tomato varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据